Understanding Science Denial: The FLICC Framework Explained
Written on
Chapter 1: The Concept of Science Denial
In this section, we will delve into the phenomenon of science denial through the lens of the FLICC acronym. Grasping this concept is crucial for enhancing critical thinking and recognizing misinformation in various contexts. By the end, you'll be equipped to identify instances of science denial and assist others in doing the same.
The FLICC acronym encompasses five key components: Fake Experts, Logical Fallacies, Impossible Expectations, Cherry-Picking, and Conspiracy Theories.
Section 1.1: Fake Experts
Fake experts are individuals who assert expertise in specific domains despite their views being at odds with established scientific knowledge. These people often lack relevant credentials, possess minimal credible publications in their claimed fields, and frequently adopt a victim mentality. The tactic of using fake experts is a clever method to instill doubt where there is little to warrant it, allowing alternative narratives to flourish.
Section 1.2: Logical Fallacies
Logical fallacies represent flaws in reasoning and are often encountered in discussions of science denial. Common types include straw man arguments, ad hominem attacks, slippery slope reasoning, and red herrings. Such fallacies undermine the validity of arguments presented by denialists.
Subsection 1.2.1: Impossible Expectations
Science denialists often impose unrealistic standards on scientific inquiry. They demand absolute proof or certainty, which is inherently unattainable. In reality, all knowledge exists within a spectrum of probability, and life rarely offers 100% certainty. This critical perspective is often absent from their evaluation of information that supports their pre-existing beliefs.
Subsection 1.2.2: Cherry-Picking
Cherry-picking refers to the selective presentation of data to support a specific conclusion. This practice distorts scientific evidence, as the studies cited may not robustly substantiate the denialist's claims. Denialists may rely on weak data that aligns with their arguments, or they may reference strong evidence that only partially supports their position.
Subsection 1.2.3: Conspiracy Theories
Conspiracy theories propose hidden plots orchestrated by powerful groups to explain significant events. Unlike legitimate conspiracies—backed by compelling evidence from credible sources—conspiracy theories often stem from flawed reasoning and psychological needs.
Chapter 2: Recognizing Science Denial
By now, you should have a clearer understanding of science denial and its various manifestations. To further enhance your knowledge, I recommend checking out the following videos that elaborate on these concepts.
The first video titled "UQx DENIAL101x 1.4.3.1 Five Characteristics of Science Denial" provides an insightful overview of the characteristics of science denial.
The second video, "DENIAL101x FLICC The Techniques of Science Denial Part 1," dives deeper into the techniques employed by science denialists and how to counter them.
Now that you're equipped with this knowledge, consider engaging with platforms like Medium to continue expanding your understanding.