# Understanding the Complexity of Gender and Biological Sex
Written on
Chapter 1: The Journey to Understanding Gender Identity
Reflecting on my childhood, I never received a direct message about being a girl. However, I distinctly remember my third-grade teacher remarking that I was behaving in an 'unladylike' manner. The following day, without my prompting, my father met with the principal to address this inappropriate comment, emphasizing its inaccuracy. That encounter marked a significant moment for me.
It wasn't until I reached high school that I truly grasped the concepts of gender identity and fluidity. Like many others, I was taught to view gender in opposition to sex. I learned that sex is a biological binary—either male or female—while gender exists on a spectrum, representing individual identity. These terms—spectrum, expression, and identity—are inherently vague, making it clear why defining gender often requires understanding what it is not.
However, as I embarked on my medical education, my understanding of the biological variations of sex deepened. Now, I am concerned that framing gender solely as the antithesis of sex may overlook a crucial aspect. In reality, the spectrum of biological sex can provide valuable insight into the fluid and complex nature of gender.
By maintaining the idea of sex as a strict binary, some individuals may choose to disregard gender based on supposed scientific evidence or, for those skeptical of science, religious beliefs. The assertion that DNA or divine design dictates humans as solely male or female can render gender a mere myth or, worse, a moral failing.
In this context, it’s not surprising that those who are gender non-conforming or identify as non-binary often face ridicule. A particularly harmful term used to demean these individuals is "hermaphrodite." This word originates from the Greek mythology of Hermes and Aphrodite, whose offspring was said to embody both male and female traits. In scientific terms, a 'true hermaphrodite' refers to someone possessing both male and female gonads—testes and ovaries. The more accurate clinical term is "ovo-testicular disorder of sexual differentiation" (OVO-DSD). It’s important to note that 'disorder' in this context refers to deviations from the average, with even the most prevalent DSD occurring in only 1 out of 10,000 individuals in the U.S.
While 'true hermaphrodite' may appear in scientific literature, it is inappropriate in casual conversation due to its historical misuse to harm others and stigmatize gender differences. A more suitable term for biological variations beyond the binary is "intersex."
OVO-DSD accounts for less than 10% of all DSDs. So, what other intersex variations exist? To comprehend this, it's essential to differentiate between genotype and phenotype. Genotype refers to an individual's genetic makeup—essentially, their chromosomes. Traditionally, the two primary genotypes are XX (female) and XY (male). Phenotype describes how a person appears, typically resulting from their genotype and environmental factors. In terms of sex, this means that XX leads to female characteristics, while XY leads to male traits.
Interestingly, all fetuses initially develop along a female pathway. This is our biological default. The presence of a functioning Y chromosome is what prompts the shift to male development. This process is driven by a gene on the Y chromosome known as 'sry'—essentially saying, 'sorry, you will become male.' This scientific principle, while complex, offers a simplified explanation of a multifaceted process.
There are numerous points in this development where things can diverge from the norm. For instance, if the Y chromosome has a mutation in the sry gene, the result may be a genotypically male (XY) individual who exhibits female characteristics due to the lack of hormonal influence. In medical terms, this condition is known as Swyer syndrome.
This raises the question: could a woman who identifies as female and presents as such (a state known as 'cisgender') potentially have an XY genotype? While this scenario is highly unlikely, it remains a possibility.
Should women rush to have their chromosomes tested? The value of such information depends on its implications for the individual. If someone has lived their life identifying and presenting as a woman, discovering they have an XY genotype is unlikely to change their self-perception. This underscores that gender identity is distinct from biological sex, yet they are not mutually exclusive.
Now, consider the ramifications if others were to discover your chromosomes read 'XY' and began categorizing you as male. Such a situation could elicit feelings of offense, mirroring the experience of being misgendered.
In this light, the spectrum of intersex conditions provides essential clarity. While it complicates the traditional scientific binary of male and female, it also simplifies the notion of 'sex' to a genetic code you might never see. Acknowledging the continuum of unseen chromosomes allows us to challenge the notion of a rigid biological binary while elevating the understanding of gender as a legitimate spectrum. Perhaps this perspective reveals that the fluidity of gender is not as nebulous, unscientific, or irreverent as it has been portrayed.
The first video titled "Is Biological Sex Binary? | Sci Guys Live! (Clip)" explores the scientific perspectives on biological sex and challenges the binary viewpoint.
Chapter 2: Challenging the Notion of Binary Sex
The second video titled "Sex Is Not Binary - Responding to Richard Dawkins" delves into arguments against the binary classification of sex, providing insights into the complexities of gender and biological identity.